IACCSEA Responds to Irish Government Consultation on ECAs

The Irish Department of Transport is proposing a new Emission Control Area (ECA) in the Northeast Atlantic Ocea at the IMO in 2025. IACCSEA seeks to engage with policy makers to establish a transition to cleaner shipping, so we welcomed the opportunity to provide comment.

IACCSEA welcomes the ambition outlined in the proposal for lower emissions of SOx PM and NOx from shipping.  Our comments are focussed on IACCSEA’s major interest – reducing emissions of NOx.

Over the last few decades our appreciation of NOx emissions from shipping has improved and we now know that NOx can travel long distances, many hundreds of miles, so the proposed wider adoption of the ECA will lead to lowering exposure to NOx in Ireland, the UK and Europe. We support the shipping sector’s willingness to play an increasingly important role in limiting its environmental impact and in reducing wider exposure to NOx emissions. We recognise the benefit / costs ratio associated with expanding NOx ECA’s now are linked to the fact that most vessels built today have Tier III compliant equipment such as Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) systems installed, and that more can and should be done to encourage more extensive adoption of Tier III compliant technology. We support policy that enables:

• Certification processes that are effective, efficient and as simple as possible so that they ensure significant reduction of NOx emissions are achieved. As part of this we support early implementation of the ECA where operation of Tier III systems is not restricted by keel laying date.
• Wider adoption of Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) to ensure “real world” compliance as an alternative to the reference-based certification schemes we have now.
• Retrofitting of Tier III technology to the existing fleet – learning the lessons from the Norwegian NOx Fond, so that NOx emissions are dramatically reduced in the short term.

If you or your organisation would like to engage with IACCSEA to discuss this topic, or explore options to join IACCSEA and help us transition to cleaner shipping, don’t hesitate to get in touch at secretary@iaccsea.com.

IACCSEA Commentary on consideration for use of biofuels

Biofuels are being widely considered for their potential to reduce GHG emissions from the marine sector as well as others.  While estimates of the net GHG reduction vary based on the source of the biomass and considerations of items like land and water usage, they continue to be contemplated as a viable option.   The extent to which they will be implemented will also significantly depend on the supply infrastructure.

Biofuels cover a wide array of potential sources from hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) to Fatty Acid Methyl Ester (FAME) to bioethanol, to biomethane gas/biomethanol.   Each of these fuels fall under the general category of biofuels some of which have EN test standards such as EN 15940 for HVO or EN 14214 for FAME or ASTM D7467 for biodiesel blends B6 to B20.  Each of the specifications provides guidance on typical items from sulfur content, heating value, flash point, ash content, corrosion indication, among other chemical and physical properties.  These specifications can assist owners and engine OEMs assess the potential influence of burning such fuel either as a blend with diesel fuel or as a “drop in” replacement.

The terminology “drop in” replacement is used to indicate the relative ease to manage the changeover from the original design fuel to the new fuel or fuel blend and consider items from storage method to engine impacts.   Engine impacts may vary based on supplier and specific details of the engine design.  Items may include items such as, operation temperature and emissions profiles among other aspects that may affect the aftertreatment system operation.

At IACCSEA, we specifically focus on the aftertreatment systems including the Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) system.   We view the use of biofuels as we do any other fuel and application interaction.  It must be assessed for impact on design parameters, performance requirements opposite regulatory requirements, system controls tuning, and potential impact on items such as; ammonia/urea system design and operation, catalyst formulation, pitch and deactivation mechanisms and resulting impact on catalyst design/operating life and overall system pressure loss.  While biofuels are being considered, the depth of actual operational data remains limited.   Published information varies in terms of the impact NO_x generation from 20-30% reduction to 10-20% increase further reinforcing the need to assess on a case specific basis.  As with other historical changes, the industry evolves and tries to assess the impact of a change based on prior “similar” applications, test data, and expected outcomes based on scientific assessment of defined properties and potential interactions.   The industry will need to continue to gather data as the adoption rate increases including detailed reporting of fuel parameters and usage rate and performance metrics e.g. DeNO_x rates, ammonia/urea usage, and equipment (catalyst) lifetime.   Assessing these parameters with online monitoring could facilitate achieving greater data density more quickly and may also assist with any changes required for re-certification, if required.

In conclusion, in addition to alternative fuels such as ammonia, hydrogen, or methanol, biofuels are a promising option to assist the marine sector to achieve its GHG reduction goals.  The industry has proven capability to assess and make appropriate adjustments to the fuel supply and storage to the engine and aftertreatment systems.  Consideration should be given to options to make any recertification process efficient while also facilitating long term efficient data collection for ongoing system management.

If you are interested in learning more about how IACCSEA works with the shipping industry to control ship emissions to the air, please get in touch with us at secretary@iaccsea.com.

References:

• DNV (2023). Exploring the potential of biofuels in shipping. Available at: https://www.dnv.com/expert-story/maritime-impact/Exploring-the-potential-of-biofuels-in-shipping
• Wärtsilä (2022). No more mysteries about marine biofuels – your top six questions answered. Available at: https://www.wartsila.com/insights/article/no-more-mysteries-about-marine-biofuels-your-top-six-questions-answered
• Crown Oil (2020). Clean Our Air with Crown HVO. Available at: https://cdn.crownoil.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Introducing-Crown-HVO.pdf
• European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) (2023). Update on Potential of Biofuels for Shipping [updated]. Available at: https://www.emsa.europa.eu/newsroom/latest-news/item/4834-update-on-potential-of-biofuels-for-shipping.html

Visualising NOx shipping emissions from space

Notably, shipping air pollution, including nitrogen oxides (NO_x) emissions, contributes to approximately 400,000 premature deaths annually, incurring societal costs exceeding €58 billion and exacerbating environmental degradation [1,2].

NO_x emissions from shipping have been analysed through satellite imagery provided by the European Space Agency, the European Environment Agency (figure 1) and the Shipping Emission Inventory Model (figure 2).

Figure 1: a) Nitrogen dioxide detection from the Copernicus Sentinel 5-P satellite [3],b) NOx emissions from shipping in European Seas [4]

Figure 2: Global shipping NOx emissions [5]

The figures note that NO_x emissions are especially high during various stages including during the operation of the engine and in transit. Emissions are also high when shipping vessels are close to shore and docked at ports. This is exemplified by recent research suggesting that the number of European cruise ships, the time they spent around ports and the fuel they consumed increased by nearly a quarter since 2019.  This has led to an increase of NO_x emissions of up to 18% during this period [6].

DeNO_x technologies such as Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) technology stand out as an advanced, cost-effective, and fuel-efficient solution for reducing NO_x emissions from shipping. SCR has the capabilities of reducing the concentration of polluting nitrogen oxide in the exhaust gases of diesel engines, to below the emission limits set by IMO Tier III regulations (3.4 g/kWh and lower). Additionally, SCR is a proven technology suitable for retrofitting and cleaning exhaust gas on existing vessels, creating an immediate positive effect on air quality.

IACCSEA is committed to supporting the shipping industry in managing local pollutants such as NO_x. We support upcoming developments in controlling ship emissions via ECAs including the Mediterranean Sea, and new proposals ahead of the MEPC 81 meeting including in the Canadian Arctic, Norwegian Sea, and North-East Atlantic Ocean. We are ready to collaborate, provide resources, and facilitate initiatives to achieve cleaner shipping practices.

If you are interested in learning more about how IACCSEA works with the shipping industry to control ship emissions to the air, please to get in touch with us at secretary@iaccsea.com.

[1] Sofiev et. Al (2018). Cleaner fuels for ships provide public health benefits with climate tradeoffs. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-02774-9

[2] NOx-fondet (2024). What is NO_x?. Available at: https://www.noxfondet.no/en/articles/what-is-nox/

[3] Copernicus (2020). Ship Emissions from Space. Available at: https://www.copernicus.eu/en/media/image-day-gallery/ship-emissions-space

[4] European Environment Agency (2023). NO_x emissions from shipping in European Seas. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/nox-emissions-from-ships-in

[5] MEICModel (2021). SEIM global shipping emissions inventory. Available at: http://meicmodel.org.cn/?p=1577&lang=en

[6] Transport & Environment (2023). Europe’s luxury cruise ships emit as much toxic sulphur as 1bn cars – study. Available at: https://www.transportenvironment.org/discover/europes-luxury-cruise-ships-emit-as-much-toxic-sulphur-as-1bn-cars-study/

IACCSEA Comment: on low temperature operation of SCR

The removal of NO_x from an engine exhaust, via SCR is a chemical process.  For the chemical reaction (the neutralisation of acidic NO_x with basic ammonia NH₃) to occur, the appropriate conditions must be provided.  For example, there must be sufficient ammonia (NH₃) in both quantity and spatial distribution matched to inlet NO_x in combination with sufficient catalyst to meet the required target emissions levels.  Of key importance is the temperature as the SCR process requires operation within a specific range.

This temperature window is dependent on several factors such as fuel type and sulphur content and is typically in the range of 300 – 500℃ (but can be lower e.g. 270℃ for lower sulphur fuels).  If the exhaust temperature falls below the specific range for its operation – the efficiency of the SCR reactions drops and fouling of catalyst (with ammonium sulphate salts) may occur.   Without appropriate management, in addition to the NO_x emissions, unreacted ammonia (NH₃) will also be released to the atmosphere.

SCR systems can tolerate limited periods of low temperature operation (with fouling). With higher temperatures these ammonium salts return to the gaseous phase, with the ammonia available to neutralise NO_x.

Therefore, managing the temperature and performance conditions is critical for the efficient and effective use of deNO_x SCR.  Minimum temperatures of operation and/or recovery temperature capability can be achieved through multiple, known technologies, each with its own advantages for a given application including energy cost, modification of target performance levels, catalyst volume, etc.  Examples include:

• Heating low temperature exhaust gas (via external sources such as burners),
• Engine management where exhaust gas temperatures are maintained at lower loads,
• Engine/battery systems that continue to maintain minimum exhaust gas temperatures with excess power (not needed a low load demand) being stored electrically,
• More advanced monitoring equipment (CEMs) that informs the operator of real-world emissions offering significant improvement on the test cycle approach.

In conclusion, when vessels operate at lower load (and lower temperatures) such as close to shore this presents challenges to deNOx technology. However, the industry has established tools to improve net performance and ensure lower NOx emissions close to shore.

North Sea Giant’s SCR Retrofit: A Catalyst for Cleaner Oceans with Support from the Norwegian NOx Fund

In the maritime industry, environmental responsibility is a major concern. The installation of a Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) system on board the North Sea Giant vessel represents a significant step in reducing harmful nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions.

Why SCR Should Be Installed

The decision to retrofit the North Sea Giant with an SCR system is grounded in the environmental responsibility of the ship owner – North Sea Shipping. Nitrogen oxides, released in high quantities by maritime engines, contribute to air pollution and are major contributors to smog, acid rain, and severe health problems such as respiratory diseases.

Improvement in Air Quality

The primary goal of the SCR system is to reduce NOx emissions. This project achieved an 80% reduction in NOx from 9 g/kWh to 1.5 g/kWh. The Norwegian NOx Fund plays a crucial role in improving the air quality in Norway as well as supporting SCR technology and other measures in marine and land-based environments.

Reduction of Social Costs

This collective commitment to environmental protection also helps to reduce the social costs associated with air pollution. Poor air quality leads to increased healthcare expenses due to higher incidences of respiratory diseases.

Overall, the SCR retrofit on the North Sea Giant, coupled with support from the Norwegian NOx Fund, is an exemplary initiative that showcases how retrofit projects can be made easy. This project ensures compliance with regulations, significantly enhances air quality, and curtails the social costs associated with air pollution. It serves as a model for how collaboration with environmental funds can drive us toward a cleaner and more sustainable future for our oceans and planet.

Shipping’s future fuels require monitoring and managing local pollutants

Last week, the International Energy Agency (IEA) published a report estimating the future fuel mix for shipping to 2050 under a net-zero scenario. According to the IEA, ammonia is projected to become the primary marine fuel at 44%, with hydrogen and biofuels at 19%, while methanol is limited at 1% [1].

This forecasted growth of alternative fuels is an encouraging step as the industry aims to decarbonise in line with the IMO’s GHG emissions reduction targets by 2050 [2]. However, as we embrace these new fuels, it’s vital to ensure that the benefits are maximised while mitigating unintended consequences like local pollutant leakage, including NOx, N₂O, ammonia slip, or methane slip [3].

The cost of poor air quality from international shipping is staggering, resulting in approximately 400,000 premature deaths each year and a societal cost of over €58 billion annually [4].

This is why the IACCSEA strongly encourages the industry to adopt emissions control technology such as Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) and Continuous Emissions Monitoring (CEMs) to manage and monitor harmful local pollutants.

This can be achieved through retrofitting existing vessels or installing such technology on new vessels. By doing so, we can improve confidence, safety, and the efficacy of the shipping industry’s future fuel mix, safeguarding human and environmental health on the journey to decarbonisation.

IACCSEA is committed to supporting the shipping industry in aligning decarbonisation objectives with the effective management of local pollutants. We are ready to collaborate, provide resources, and facilitate initiatives to achieve cleaner shipping practices.

If you are interested in learning more about how IACCSEA works with the shipping industry to control ship emissions to the air, please to get in touch with us at secretary@iaccsea.com.

Sources:

[1] International Energy Agency (IEA), 2023. Net Zero Roadmap: A Global Pathway to Keep the 1.5 °C Goal in Reach — 2023 Update. Available here: https://www.iea.org/events/net-zero-roadmap-a-global-pathway-to-keep-the-1-5-c-goal-in-reach-2023-update

[2] International Maritime Organization (IMO), 2023. Revised GHG reduction strategy for global shipping adopted. Available here: https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/Pages/Revised-GHG-reduction-strategy-for-global-shipping-adopted-.aspx

[3] Mærsk Mc-Kinney Møller Center for Zero Carbon Shipping, 2023. Managing Emissions from Ammonia-Fueled Vessels. Available at: https://cms.zerocarbonshipping.com/media/uploads/documents/Ammonia-emissions-reduction-position-paper_v4.pdf#13

[4] European Federation for Transport and Environment, 2023. Air Pollution. Available here: https://www.transportenvironment.org/challenges/ships/ship-air-pollution/

Future Fuels in Shipping

Comparing future fuels in shipping

Using alternative fuels in marine transport can play a critical role in decarbonising the shipping sector and contributing towards climate change goals. The market for alternative fuels continues to develop through ship builders, engine manufacturers and classification societies under the guidance of MARPOL regulations (International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships) adopted by the International Marine Organisation (IMO).

One key consideration for marine alternative fuels is how current maritime legislation, largely shaped towards conventional fuel types, addresses the adoption of alternative fuels. For example, to meet NOx emission limits, an Engine International Air Pollution Prevention (EIAPP) Certificate under MARPOL is required when building a maritime diesel engine according to the NOx Technical code.  In the future EIAPP certificates will need to address emissions from combusting alternative fuels to ensure that the market can provide the necessary solutions to aid in the decarbonisation of the maritime industry.  The table below provides an overview of the major fuel options available within the marine sector. It considers the current advantages, disadvantages, emissions profile as well as where catalytic solutions exist in controlling and reducing these emissions.

About IACCSEA

Since its formation in 2011, IACCSEA has had a primary focus of demonstrating the technological and economic viability of catalytic technology for reducing emissions from shipping.

We do this by:

• Sharing objective and factual technical information

We leverage our collective industry expertise and networks to gather and disseminate objective and factual technical information on marine catalytic emission control technologies (including costs and benefits) and promote awareness of this technology, including latest developments.

• Contributing to industry groups and forums, and regulatory discussions

We use our voice to primarily inform regulators and the shipping community that proposed regulations for reducing emissions from shipping can be met through commercially available catalytic after treatment technology.

• Working with others in the shipping community

We work closely with other stakeholders in the continued development and implementation of strategies that lead to cleaner shipping and raises awareness of the benefits of this technology among stakeholder groups and in the regulatory arena.

Danfoss IXA announcement

Allan Skouboe, Chief Technical Officer at Danfoss IXA

IACCSEA is pleased to welcome Danfoss IXA as a new member. With extensive experience in exhaust gas after treatment, Danfoss are positioned to play a key role in the ‘green wave’ of technological development.

On joining IACCSEA, Allan Skouboe, Chief Technical Officer at Danfoss IXA, stated “We are happy to join an organization which is focused on the use of SCR technology in the maritime business. Our state-of-the art NOx sensor is widely used across the industry in connection with SCR and the membership of IACCSEA help us to stay ahead on industry requirements and trends.”.

Speaking on behalf of IACCSEA Ilkka Saarinen said “We look forward to engaging with Allan and the team in the years to come. Monitoring emissions from ship engines will grow in importance as shipping embraces being cleaner and greener”.

About IACCSEA
Since its formation in 2011, the International Association for Catalytic Control of Ship Emissions to Air (IACCSEA) has focussed on demonstrating the technological and economic viability of on board Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) technology to reduce Ox emissions.  We work closely with other stakeholders in the continued development and implementation of strategies that lead to cleaner shipping and to improve awareness of the benefits of SCR technology.

#BeatAirPollution

June 5th marked the World Environment Day, which in 2019 focused on creating awareness on air pollution and encouraging action aimed at minimising its effects on people’s health and the environment. It is our mission at IACCSEA to be a catalyst for clean shipping, and in the spirit of the day we would like to take the opportunity to remind everyone about the effects of nitrogen oxide (NOx). Formed in the heat of the marine engine, NOx is a dangerous, acidic pollutant that can be transported over many hundreds of miles and deposited as acid rain. It promotes the formation of ground level ozone, detrimental to human health and is known to exacerbate heart and lung complaints. NOx acidifies its environment and damages plant life in the sea and on land.

There are ways, however, to neutralise the NOx in the exhaust of the marine engine. Selective Catalytic Reduction technologies are a simple, cost-effective and proven NOx reduction solution capable of achieving the emission limits set by the International Maritime Organisation, and in many cases up to 99% reduction of NOx emissions.

If you would like to learn more, please do get in touch with us at secretary@iaccsea.com.

For more information on International Environment Day: https://www.un.org/en/events/environmentday/

IACCSEA welcomes the IMO GHG emissions reduction strategy